Complaint Letter
To: Supervision Office of Shanghai Higher People's Court
Complainer: Shi
Chaosheng, Male, born on xx, 1959, Han nationality, ID Number: xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
Address: xx, xxxx, xx Town, Songjiang District, Shanghai, Contact Phone: xxxx.
Complained Persons:
1.
Lu Wangshu(陆望舒), Judge of Chedun People's Court of Songjiang
District People's Court of Shanghai, presiding judge of the case of marital
property division (Case No.: (2025) Hu 0117 Min Chu No. 19666);
2. Cai Jun（蔡珺）, Judge of Songjiang District People's Court of Shanghai, presiding
judge of the divorce case (Case No.: (2024) Hu 0117 Min Chu No. 25967);
3. Chen Chang（陈昌）, Secretary and President of Songjiang District People's Court of
Shanghai;
4. Zhuang Qian（庄倩）, President of Chedun People's Court of Songjiang District People's
Court of Shanghai.
Core Grounds for Complaint
The complainer is a patient with advanced lung cancer and
the plaintiff in Case No. (2025) Hu 0117 Min Chu No. 19666. During the trial,
Judge Lu Wangshu, the presiding judge of the case, intentionally violated legal
procedures, improperly determined the basic facts of the case, illegally refused
to investigate key evidence, erroneously identified 1,585,017.54 yuan, which
should be community property of the couple, as the defendant's pre-marital
property, and illegally deprived the complainer of a
huge amount of medical expenses for cancer treatment. Judge Cai Jun neglected her
duties and refused to investigate the defendant's act of concealing property in
the preliminary divorce case, laying a hidden danger for the subsequent
improper judgment. As superior leaders, Chen Chang and Zhuang Qian ignored the complainer's
urgent appeal as a patient with advanced cancer, failed to effectively
supervise and condoned the disciplinary and illegal acts of the judges under
their jurisdiction. Now, I complain in accordance with the law, requesting a
thorough investigation into the disciplinary, illegal and improper judgment
acts of the complained persons, pursue their corresponding disciplinary and
legal responsibilities, and legally initiate retrial proceedings to protect the
complainer's legitimate rights to life, health and property.
Basic Facts and Background of the Case
The complainer and the defendant Ren xx registered their
marriage on November 9, 1992. Due to the impact of an external case, they
divorced by agreement on August 29, 2019. At the time of divorce, about 1
million yuan of community cash property of the couple under Ren xx's name was
not divided. They remarried on May 11, 2021, and there Ire no other marital
connections during their marriage. The complainer contributed more than 90% of
the family property. His income before and during the marriage was handed over
to Ren xx for disposal and financial management, and his salary card was also
kept by her.
On May 15, 2021, the complainer was diagnosed with
malignant tumor of the right middle lobe of the lung - adenocarcinoma of the
right middle lobe, Stage IVA (advanced stage). Subsequent treatment requires
high medical expenses, and the condition continues to deteriorate. After
targeted drug resistance, it is necessary to continuously change treatment
plans and use high-priced self-funded drugs.
In October 2024, Ren xx sued for divorce from the complainer
(Case No.: (2024) Hu 0117 Min Chu No. 25967), and the court ruled against
divorce. However, as the actual controller of the community property of the
couple, Ren xx repeatedly refused to pay medical expenses to the complainer.
Due to lack of money for treatment, the complainer had to apply for a loan from
the town government and participate in a phase I clinical drug trial with
extremely high risks, and her act has been suspected of illegal abandonment.
In July 2025, to ensure the demand for treatment in the
advanced stage of cancer, the complainer filed a lawsuit for division of
marital property during the marriage (Case No.: (2025) Hu 0117 Min Chu No.
19666), requesting the division of the community property of the couple
concealed under Ren xx's name. After the trial of the case, Judge Lu Wangshu
only ordered Ren xx to pay the complainer xxxxxxx yuan as property
compensation, erroneously identified 1,585,017.54 yuan, which should be
community property of the couple, as Ren xx's pre-marital property, and
illegally ordered the complainer, as the victim, to bear most of the case
acceptance fees, seriously infringing on the legitimate rights and interests of
the complainer.
Specific Disciplinary, Illegal and Improper Judgment Acts
of the Complained Persons
1. Judge Lu Wangshu: Intentionally made improper
judgment, violated legal procedures, and subjectively and maliciously deprived
the complainer with advanced cancer of medical expenses
Concealed major facts of the case and ignored the key
circumstance of undivided property
The civil judgment of Case No. (2025) Hu 0117 Min Chu No.
19666 clearly states that when the complainer and Ren xx divorced by agreement
in 2019, about 1 million yuan of community cash property of the couple under
her name was not divided, which is the core dispute of the case. However, Judge
Lu Wangshu intentionally concealed this major fact during the judgment, did not
conduct any review or identification on the subsequent whereabouts of the
undivided cash and the converted financial management funds, which directly led
to the wrong determination of the basic facts of the case and laid a core
hidden danger for the subsequent improper division of property.
Illegally refused the legal application for investigation
and evidence collection, and deliberately evaded the fact that the defendant
concealed property.
On July 31, 2025, the complainer's lawyer legally
submitted an application for an investigation order to the court, requesting an
investigation into Ren xx's bank fund flow since May 1, 2013, to verify the
community property of the couple concealed by her at the time of divorce in
2019 and the source of subsequent financial management funds. Judge Lu Wangshu
only allowed the investigation of the flow since 2023, and unreasonably refused
the key flow from 2013 to 2023.
The complainer submitted written objections to Lu Wangshu
three times on August 14 and August 24, 2025, and submitted certificates of
financial products of Ren xx in Bank of China, Industrial and Commercial Bank
of China and Bank of Communications from 2012 to 2018 (with a total principal
of more than 1.33 million yuan + 40,000 US dollars, all of which are community
property of the couple), clearly informing that the restriction on the scope of
investigation would mislead the judgment result; on September 26, 2025, the complainer
raised objections again through the 12368 litigation service hotline, but Judge
Lu Wangshu insisted on his own way and continued to illegally refuse the legal
investigation request, resulting in the fact that Ren xx concealed a huge
amount of community property of the couple could not be fixed through judicial
investigation.
Violated legal cross-examination procedures and
erroneously determined the nature of property without evidence support
Without any effective evidence support, Judge Lu Wangshu
violated the legal procedures for evidence cross-examination stipulated in the
Civil Procedure Law, failed to organize both parties to cross-examine the
source of 1,585,017.54 yuan of financial management funds under Ren xx's name
in Shanghai Pufa Bank (969,119.96 yuan), Bank of Communications (465,897.58
yuan) and Bank of China (150,000 yuan), and subjectively and intentionally
identified the above funds as Ren xx's "pre-marital property", and
rejected the complainer's claim on the ground that "Shi Chaosheng failed
to prove that the financial management was purchased with his capital
contribution".
In fact, Ren xx retired in 2019, with a monthly pension
of only about xxxx yuan and no other sources of income. It was impossible for
her to suddenly have a huge amount of funds for financial management after the
divorce. The above funds Ire all converted from the undivided community
property of the couple in 2019. The complainer has submitted preliminary
evidence such as income certificates, financial product certificates and bank
transfer records to complete the burden of proof. The determination of Judge Lu
Wangshu is a typical improper judgment without evidence support.
Illegally divided the case acceptance fees, favored the
erring party, and caused serious judicial injustice
In this case, Ren xx had obvious faults: first, she
concealed the community property of the couple, gave false testimony in the
trial of the divorce case, falsely claimed that she only had 100,000 yuan in
cash but submitted evidence of 1.45 million yuan in financial management in
Shanghai Pufa Bank in court; second, she refused to pay medical expenses to her
spouse with advanced cancer, which is suspected of the crime of abandonment.
According to legal provisions, Ren xx should have borne all the case acceptance
fees, but Judge Lu Wangshu engaged in irregularities for personal gain, ordered
the complainer to bear 7,614 yuan out of 8,891 yuan of acceptance fees, and
only ordered Ren xx to bear 1,277 yuan, which seriously violated the principle
of fairness and caused serious consequences of judicial injustice.
Intentionally delayed the case handling process and
missed the best treatment opportunity for the complainer with advanced cancer
The complainer is a patient with advanced lung cancer.
During the trial of the case, his condition continued to deteriorate, with
symptoms of brain metastasis and bone metastasis. He repeatedly applied to the
court for expedited trial and requested supervision by the president, hoping to
obtain property division funds in a timely manner to purchase high-priced
mature self-funded drugs. However, Judge Lu Wangshu ignored this, intentionally
delayed the case handling process, deliberately evaded the core property
dispute, resulting in the complainer being unable to obtain treatment funds in
a timely manner and having to be forced to participate in a phase I clinical
drug trial with extremely high risks and strong side effects, missing the best
treatment opportunity, with obvious subjective malice.
Retaliated against the complainer's petition and abused
judicial power
Due to the above series of illegal acts of Judge Lu
Wangshu in the case trial, the complainer legally carried out petition for
rights protection. Although there were emotional expressions during the period,
they Ire all reasonable demands to protect his own legitimate rights to life
and health. Dissatisfied with the petition, Judge Lu Wangshu abused his public power
and directly retaliated against the complainer by refusing to investigate
evidence, improperly determining facts, and erroneously ruling on property
division funds, which directly led to significant and irreversible damage to
the complainer's legitimate rights and interests.
Judge Cai Jun: Negligence of duty, dereliction of duty
and inaction, refusal to investigate the fact that the defendant concealed
property
In the divorce case (Case No.: (2024) Hu 0117 Min Chu No.
25967), as the presiding judge, Judge Cai Jun found in the trial that Ren xx
gave false testimony in court (falsely claiming that she only had 100,000 yuan
in cash, but submitted evidence of more than 1 million yuan + 450,000 yuan in
financial management in Shanghai Pufa Bank). The complainer legally applied to
investigate Ren xx's bank flow since January 1, 2016 to verify the concealed
property, but Judge Cai Jun neglected his duties and directly refused the legal
investigation application, failing to perform his legal duty of investigation
and verification, resulting in the fact that Ren xx concealed property was not
identified in the case, laying a direct hidden danger for the subsequent
improper judgment of Judge Lu Wangshu, and his act has constituted dereliction
of duty.
Chen Chang and
Zhuang Qian: Inadequate supervision, connivance, and indifference to the
sufferings of the masses with advanced cancer
As the Secretary and President of Songjiang District
People's Court and the President of Chedun People's Court respectively, Chen
Chang and Zhuang Qian are the direct superior leaders of Judges Lu Wangshu and
Cai Jun. When the complainer repeatedly reflected the illegal problems in the
case trial through petition and clearly informed that he was a patient with
advanced lung cancer in urgent need of judicial relief, the two ignored the
sufferings of the masses' life and health and the complainer's reasonable and
legal demands, failed to correct any of the disciplinary, illegal and improper
judgment acts of Judges Lu Wangshu and Cai Jun, but instead condoned and even
endorsed them, with serious absence of supervision responsibilities, leading to
the continuous occurrence of judicial injustice and causing bad judicial and
social impacts.
Legitimate Requests of the Complainer
1. Based on the above facts, the acts of the Complained
person Lu Wangshu have violated the provisions of the Civil Procedure Law of
the People's Republic of China, the Judges Law, the Regulations on Disciplinary
Actions of the Communist Party of China, etc., and are suspected of the crime
of improper judgment as stipulated in Article 399, Paragraph 2 of the Criminal
Law of the People's Republic of China; Judge Cai Jun constitutes negligence of
duty and dereliction of duty; Chen Chang and Zhuang Qian, as superior leaders,
have inadequate supervision and connivance. To protect the legitimate rights
and interests of the complainer and defend judicial justice, I hereby put
forward the following requests in accordance with the law:
Legally initiate retrial proceedings: Request to immediately initiate retrial of the effective
civil judgment of Case No. (2025) Hu 0117 Min Chu No. 19666 ex officio by
designating the Shanghai No. 1 Intermediate People's Court, the superior court
of the original trial, in accordance with the provisions of Article 205 of the
Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China.
2. Legally re-divide the community property of the
couple: Request to order the defendant Ren xx to pay the complainer
1,585,017 yuan as compensation for the community property of the couple in the
retrial in accordance with the provisions of Article 1092 of the Civil Code of
the People's Republic of China (this amount does not include the xxxxxxx yuan
already paid in the original judgment), so as to ensure the complainer's fund
demand for treatment in the advanced stage of cancer.
3. Legally change the subject of bearing the case
acceptance fees: Request to order the defendant Ren xx to bear all the
original case acceptance fees of Case No. (2025) Hu 0117 Min Chu No. 19666, and
pay the complainer 7,614 yuan of acceptance fees if already prepaid.
4. Legally pursue the disciplinary and legal
responsibilities of the Complained persons:
(1) Request to impose corresponding disciplinary
sanctions on Lu Wangshu, Cai Jun, Chen Chang and Zhuang Qian in accordance with
the provisions of Article 126 of the Regulations on Disciplinary Actions of the
Communist Party of China and Article 10 of the Judges Law;
(2) Request to severely pursue the illegal trial and
dereliction of duty acts of Lu Wangshu and Cai Jun in accordance with the
provisions of Articles 8 and 14 of the Measures for the Investigation of
Responsibility for Illegal Trials by Judges of People's Courts, and revoke
their relevant judicial positions;
(3) Request to file a case for investigation into Lu
Wangshu's act of improper judgment in accordance with the provisions of Article
399, Paragraph 2 of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, and
pursue her criminal responsibility in accordance with the law.
Solemn Statement
The complainer is a patient with advanced lung cancer,
and his condition has developed brain metastasis and bone metastasis. Due to
the improper judgment of Judge Lu Wangshu, he was illegally deprived of a huge
amount of medical expenses, resulting in the complainer being unable to
purchase high-priced mature self-funded drugs in a timely manner for effective
treatment, and having to be forced to participate in a clinical drug trial with
extremely high risks. His condition continues to deteriorate, and he has
suffered great physical and mental blows.
If unpredictable tragedies such as the complainer's
suicide occur due to improper handling of this complaint, all legal
consequences and social impacts shall be fully borne by Lu Wangshu, Cai Jun,
Chen Chang and Zhuang Qian.
I earnestly request your Supervision Office to conduct a
comprehensive and thorough investigation into the matters Complained this time
in accordance with the principle of taking facts as the basis and law as the
criterion, make a fair handling in accordance with the law, timely protect the
legitimate rights and interests of the complainer, demonstrate judicial
justice, and avoid causing bad social impacts!
Respectfully,
Complainer (Electronic Signature): Shi Chaosheng
March 18, 2026
Annexes of Core Evidence
1. Income certificates of the complainer and Ren xx, the
defendant in the original trial;
2. Court trial opinions of the divorce case (Case No.
25967);
3. Application for investigation order and three
objections;
4. Partial petition materials;
5. Civil judgment of Case No. 19666.
没有评论:
发表评论