搜索此博客

2026年6月4日星期四

邻里相邻权侵权原委

 早年起因:叶永龙违建、私植毛竹侵权

  • 叶永龙在2010年前后在自家院落北侧违规搭建七八十平米楼房,同时破坏小区原有绿化私自大面积栽种毛竹,毛竹逐年疯长,不断侵入我院落,长期遮挡房屋采光通风。我方多次沟通、委托物业依规修剪,均被叶永龙及其家人无故阻拦,相邻侵权持续存在。



  • 2023 年 10 月 29 日:迫于持续侵权,我对侵入地界毛竹做处置
    因长期维权无果,在毛竹持续妨害居住的情况下,我对越界毛竹做药剂处理,随后叶永龙一方以我使用危险药剂报警。
  • 2023 年 10 月 31 日:三方达成书面调解协议

  • 由明华居委会李永强书记牵头,新桥民警、物业、双方共同在场签订调解协议,协议明确约定:叶永龙自愿放弃追究用药相关责任、配合公安机关撤案。


  • 2023 年 11 月 11 日:公安出具鉴定结论
    松江分局出具沪公松 (新桥) 行鉴通字〔2023〕00187 号鉴定文书,确认我使用的环嗪酮不属于危险物质,不存在违法用药情形。至此,用药一事在法律层面彻底了结。


  • 2024 年 7 月 31 日:居民小组现场协调,叶永龙口头承诺移栽毛竹
    经居民小组组织调解,叶永龙当场承诺将侵权毛竹移栽、院落北侧不再种竹,但事后拒不履约。


  • 2024 年 8 月 8 日:叶永龙妻子杨颖在业主群明确表示无需我方赔偿
  • 杨颖在小区微信群公开发言,明确放弃索要任何赔偿。但事后其违背承诺,暗中唆使公安机关向我索要赔偿。


  • 2024 年 1 月 8 日:受叶永龙唆使,派出所对我违法强制传唤

  • 在鉴定结论已出、调解协议约定撤案、对方已放弃追责的前提下,叶永龙夫妇在知晓我身患癌症晚期后,恶意唆使新桥派出所出警。当日 7 时,三名民警(其中两名便衣,违规没有亮明身份),违规驾驶民用车辆持沪公松(新桥)传唤字〔2024〕00018 号文书上门,违规使用警械,将我带回派出所违法限制人身自由 8 小时。新桥派出所的执法行为涉嫌滥用职权,非法拘禁刑事犯罪。


  • 事后办案寿警官明确证实:本次传唤系叶永龙夫妻主动要求。


  • 2024 年 1 月 14 日:再次签署治安文书,重申药剂不属于危险品

  • 派出所组织签订相关手续,再次书面确认我所用药物不在危险物质范畴,却仍受叶永龙授意要求我承担赔偿,明显违背此前调解约定。



  • 2024 年 10 月 14 日派出所调解:叶永龙当庭虚假否认此前移栽承诺

  • 新桥派出所吴指导员、张警长组织双方调解,叶永龙刻意隐瞒 7 月 31 日移栽承诺、当庭说谎,居委会在场未予以纠正,毛竹侵权状态持续至今。
  • 新桥派出所 110 报警调解会纪要
    时间:2024-10-14 下午 1 点
    地点:新桥派出所一楼调解室
    参加人:
    吴指导员 049944 电话 1xxx
    14x 业主 叶永龙
    2zz 业主 石朝生
    一, 7-31 居民小组协调会意见的法律效力及不履行
    1. 7-31 居民小组调解会,这些邻居都和 140 要好,叶离开会议前作
    出表示,: 居民小组提个建议,我就照办。小组建议:140 将毛竹
    移栽它处,140 院子北面不再栽种毛竹。叶的表示具有法律效力,
    构成授权邻居做出建议,并承诺照办。
    2. 叶说, 张警长复述; 7-31 居民小组建议,在今天调解会之前不
    知情。 事实是,开会第二天小组成员到他家砍了几颗竹子,相信
    也告知了头天晚上达成的一致意见。叶对警察说谎,有必要请邻居
    作证。此事十分重大,质证是揭穿叶出尔反尔,不守承诺,蔑视法
    律和警察调查的关键,其行为可能会影响警察对案件的调查和判
    断,进而影响到整个司法程序的公正性和效率。如证实叶说谎,根
    据刑法第 305 条规定其构成了伪证罪,必须依法追究。3. 今天调解会警方并没有对 140 违背承诺问题提出召集小组成员质
    证,也没有对他做任何教育和训诫,更没有责令其履行承诺,这是
    调解会的一大瑕疵。
    二, 140 邻居恶意栽种毛竹,寻衅滋事,破坏社会安宁,违反《治
    安管理条例》,应予追究而未提及
    石反复强调,140 恶意栽种毛竹,不仅仅是对相邻权的妨害,今天报
    警,依照《治安管理处罚条例》第 26 条,第三款之规定,理由是:
    140 明知栽种的毛竹对我有妨害,经善意沟通,不予理睬,物业上门
    依法修剪,又被多次恶意阻拦,居委会书记亲自做工作,口上答应处
    理,就是不排除妨害,逼迫他人依法行使自卫权,近期在党领导下的
    居民小组调解会上做出承诺,移栽毛竹,继而出尔反尔,违背具有法
    律效力的承诺,并向警方作伪证,涉嫌故意寻衅滋事,扰乱社会安宁
    和伪证罪。今天调解会警方并没有对 140 寻衅滋事,扰乱社会安宁违
    法问题予以关注。也没对 140 叶进行教育训诫。反映调解警官法律意
    识淡薄,有可能不能依法公正调解。
    三, 今天没有达成任何调解协议, 吴,张警官表示在 72 小时内亲
    到现场了解情况,再做调解。可以接受。
    纪要人 石朝生
    2024-10-14

  • 控告 上海市松江公安分局新桥派出所非法插手民事纠纷,滥用公权,非法拘禁


    上海市松江区人民检察院;


    特别声明:

    本人身患癌症晚期,身体持续恶化,随时存在病重无法继续理性维权风险,为
    杜绝非理性维权行为发生,恳请贵检察院落实件件有回音、事事有着落工作要求,
    优先加急受理核查,尽快在 7日内书面答复受理情况,依法查处涉案民警违纪3 / 3
    违法行为。如逾期未依规处置,本人将走访上海市委办公厅,呈请陈吉宁书记
    责令督办并逐级向上海市纪委监委、上级政法机关继续信访维权。


    一,控告人:

    石朝生,恶性肿瘤终末期;住址:上海松江区新桥镇xx小区xxx号;

     

    二、被控告人

    1. 上海松江公安新桥派出所办案民警及审批负责人:涉嫌滥用职权罪、非法拘禁罪(《刑法》238、397条),办案人员详细信息已申请政府信息公开,待补全。

    2. 叶永龙(xxx号业主):涉嫌诬告陷害罪、教唆滥用职权罪;


    案情原由

     

    三、四项控告诉求

     

    1. 立案侦查:追究叶永龙教唆民警、诬告陷害刑责;追究新桥派出所民警违法强制传唤、非法拘禁8小时、滥用职权刑事责任 ;


    2. 检察院依职权调取:2024.1.8传唤卷宗、审批手续、出警笔录、2024.10.14全案调解案卷;


    3. 查处叶永龙调解会虚假陈述、隐瞒此前整改承诺的伪证违法;


    4. 按检察信访规定7日内程序性回复受理意见、按期书面告知审查/立案进展;因本人重病生存期有限,申请绿色通道加急优先办理。

     

    四、核心事实

     

    1. 基础纠纷已全部民事了结,无任何治安违法事实

     

    邻里采光纠纷经2023.10.31三方调解撤案、2023.11.11公安鉴定:本人所用药剂非危险品、排除违法;2024.7.31居民小组约定叶永龙移栽侵权毛竹、11.19再次签订整改协议,叶永龙持续违约拒不整改,纯属民事违约。

     

    2. 叶永龙恶意教唆警方动用公权力报复

     

    叶永龙夫妻前期在业主群明确放弃索赔,事后恶意反悔、唆使民警上门传唤;办案寿警官录音证实:2024.1.8传唤系叶永龙夫妇主动要求启动,借公安公权力打击报复重病老兵。

     

    3. 新桥派出所民警无事实违法办案、非法拘禁

     

    2024.1.8在无违法事实前提下,3名警员持传唤证上门,对癌症晚期优抚老人违规强制传唤、使用警械,在派出所无合法留置手续限制人身自由8小时;审批人违规审批传唤文书,违规插手民间邻里民事纠纷,符合渎职侵权立案标准 。

     

    五、法律依据

     

    1.《刑法》29条:教唆犯罪追责;238条:公职人员非法拘禁追责;397条:滥用职权追责;

    2.《人民警察法》:严禁民警违规限制人身自由、插手民间民事纠纷;

    3.最高检渎职立案标准:拘禁重病优抚对象、造成人身损害应予刑事立案。


    控告人:石朝生


    2026-6-3

    联系方式: charlesshi88@outlook.com

    2025年8月28日星期四

    Deloitte employee attacking Father-in-law with extreme offensive and political sensitive language and Deloitte has no moral clarity

    Deloitte US Employee attacking Cancer Dying Father-in-Law by writing:


    "Fucking wow you are a stupid, miserable piece of shit. If you try anything as idiotic as "contacting my employer" or blasting me on social media I will notify every applicable US and Chinese government agency I can find of your attempted extortion. ..I guess you will be OK though because the Chinese government is very lenient with criminal behavior right?"


    Deloitte Ethics officers didn't care to look into the ethics complaint as below



    25th Aug.,2025


    Dear chief ethics officer of Deloitte,


    My name is Charles Shi, Chinese citizen living in Shanghai. I am the father-in-law or Soon-to-be- ex- father-in-law of Mr. Gerald Aubin(Jerry), specialist master at Deloitte Arlington office, Virginia.

     


    My daughter Y married Jerry a few years ago and they lived together at xxxx Ct, , VA  They are probably in divorce process now.

     I am a late stage lung cancer patient since May 2021. I sued my daughter Y who worked as Level 2 data scientist of xxx for alimony compensation at a Shanghai Court in July 2025 because Y refused to give money covering part of my exorbitant medical bills asked repeatedly since Dec 2024.

     The court served legal documents including summon, date plan of hearings by EMS express mail which was delivered 21 August,2025 to xxxx Ct address. The mail delivery receipt was signed off not by Y leaving great concerns for her participating legal process here in China.

    Since Y could not be contacted, I contacted Y’s husband Jerry, my son-in-law, the Deloitte employee to clarify if he signed off the delivery note and if the court paperwork package was handed over to Y. I asked Jerry by email demanding feed back in an urgent manner.

    To make sure Jerry would reply, I called Jerry at 8am and 9 am Virginia time 22 August by Wechat, the tool we used to communicate in the past.

     Jerry did not pick up the calls as he did not in Dec 2024 when I called him a few times to check his wife and my daughter’s whereabout since Y refused then to pick up calls for demand of medical bill payment.

     I have legitimate concern that Jerry would not answer my family yet legal related questions. I had to write a warning email in below email trails.

    Jerry DID write back shortly and clarified he did not sign off the mail delivery. OK. It was accepted.

     However Jerry did not answer other legitimate questions and used vulgar and extremely offensive language to express his dislikes, some are politically sensitive which might not make him or Deloitte look good if exposed and his deeds clearly did not conform to Deloitte integrity policy.

     

    Before retirement, I worked for a US airspace company as East Asia supply chain manager over 10 years and I became a whistleblower on a major counterfeiting Boeing safety parts fraud by a Chinese supplier. My story was covered by Reuters, NBC, Epoch Times and other major media outlets. 

    My request is very simple:

     I wish the ethics officer can immediately talk Jerry who is the husband of Y, the defendant, into answering my remaining questions in writing by email so I can produce it to the Court evidencing Y was or was not in receipt of legal paperwork in case Y still lives, same as Jerry, at the xxxx Ct address.

     If Y moved out, has Jerry knowledge of her new address?

     Jerry has to send me the marriage or divorce certificate evidencing he is the legal person with relationship to defendant answering asked questions.

     I believe 72 hours is enough for you to feed me back in receipt of this complaint.

     Thank you and best regards

     

    Charles Shi

     

    Email: charlesshi88@outlook.com

    Blogger: https://charlesshi.blogspot.com/2025/07/201905914834.html

    呼吁全球关注: 举报特大假冒波音飞机安全零件的老人,癌症晚期,家人不给医疗金,向法院起诉求偿,法院慢作为,胡作为,有可能耽误救治和生命

    特急!!!第二次给中央驻上海巡视组王荣军组长举报函

    X.com https://x.com/CharlesShithew1

    Facebook https://www.facebook.com/charles.shi.925

    Youtube:@charlesshi9835

     

     

     

    发件人: chaosheng shi <
    发送时间: 2025年8月23日 3:05
    收件人: Jerry Aubin
    抄送: j
    主题: 回复: Very Important, please give me answers within 24hours

     Jerry,

     Please accept my sincere apology for pushing too hard on you getting back answers. I tried to call you by wechat twice after 8am and 9am Virginia time with no response  that led to my wrongful idea that you might not take it as important and urgent. Please, please give it a thought I am a cancer dying old man in a desperate state mind.

     

     Since you said soon-to-be-ex-father-in-law, this looks still a family matter, let us do it a family way. Cool down!

     

    Please let me know by your next email:

     

    1.  Does Y still live at xxx Ct address? IF she still lives at this address, can you try to ask her if she received the Court docs?

     

    2.  IF she moved out, do you have any knowledge where her new address is?

     

    After I get answers from you, Jerry,  IF  question 1 was negative, I shall start investigating who and why the mail could have been nowhere and Y was not in receipt of the legal docs. Then I shall advise the Court what and how to do with serving court docs to the defendant.

     

    Thank you and best regards

     

    Charles

     

     

    发件人: Jerry Aubin <
    发送时间: 2025年8月22日 22:30
    收件人: chaosheng shi <
    抄送:
    主题: Re: Very Important,please give me answers within 24hours

     

    Dear soon-to-be-ex-father-in-law:

     

    Thank you for reaching out and threatening me in the same same period of time in which I was continuously sleeping.

     

    Regarding your matter:

    1. That is not my signature. That does not even remotely resemble my name.
    2. I was not at home (or even within 15 minutes of home) on August 21, 2025 at 12:43 pm. This can be backed up by my Google Maps timeline, lunch receipts, and several colleagues.

     

    I have no idea whose signature that is. Maybe USPS accidently delivered it to a neighbor or something. Call them and ask for a description of the signer or something. I don't know and I don't care as I can prove I was not anywhere near that location at that time and this matter is none of my business in the first place.

     

    Threatening me after not responding for 6 hours regarding a 24 hour timeline when you originally emailed me at 3am? Not even going through legal channels and threatening to take actions to attempt to ruin my life if you thought I was doing something? Fucking wow you are a stupid, miserable piece of shit. If you try anything as idiotic as "contacting my employer" or blasting me on social media I will notify every applicable US and Chinese government agency I can find of your attempted extortion (with the proof you so moronically provided in writing). I guess you will be OK though because the Chinese government is very lenient with criminal behavior right?

     

    If there is anything else you require, please either get a subpoena on me like a non-lunatic or go fuck yourself. Personally I would now prefer the latter after the past several hours of your communication.

     

    Worst regards,
    Jerry

     

    On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 9:16 AM chaosheng shi  wrote:

     

    Jerry,

     

    Following up last email which you may or may not want to reply, here below are the legal implications of your sign off express mail on behalf of Y. My last questions carry crucial legal consequences as the mail contains Court legal docs for a major foreign family law suit.  I need your clarification to give the Court to establish the firm fact that Y was in receipt or not in receipt of the mail. You might accidentally got involved in the matter, but you have legal responsibility now to truthfully answer questions or will be in trouble yourself.

     

    In case you remain silent, I shall be compelled to write to your work place asking management to put pressure on you, I don’t  recommend you would rather me do that. IF that does not work out, I shall make a youtube or tik tok  clip or write in Google blogger  mentioning your name and identity for concealing legal docs for a lawsuit concerning your spouse mistreatment of a cancer father who is dY because of no money to pay medical bills. My best suggestion is you consult a lawyer if you decides to remail silent.

     

    Best regards

     

    Charles

     

    发件人: chaosheng shi <

    收件人: Jerry Aubin

     
    发送时间: 2025年8月22日 15:37;

     

    主题: Very Important,please give me answers within 24hours
    重要性: 高

     

    Jerry,

     

    I have sent you same messages below to your WeChat, please answer questions together with related certificates using email. Thanks.

     

    1. I sued Y for alimony compensation at a Shanghai Court. 2. The Court EMS expressed legal docs including Court Summons to Y at xxxx address which was signed off receipt by you 2025-8-21,see the sign off receipt as attached.
    2. Have you handed the EMS mail to Y? I wrote in a separate email demanding that she either discuss a settlement with my Chinese lawyer or she must participate the law suit or I shall publish her private information to media as well as the matter she refused to support her father when in need of medical help, although I spent RMB4million(over half million USD)for her US study from undergraduate to graduate.
    3. IF Y no longer lives at the address, do you know where is she?
    4. I heard from her mother that Y had trouble with your marriage, are you two still married? IF so, please send me the marriage certificate as a proof that the EMS was received by husband of Y to the Court. This is vital for Court to make decision for hearing arrangement.
    5. Jerry, I know this is not good staff, but I have no other choice to ask compensation from Y, also from her mother who refused to give me money for cancer treatment, My family's asset is all under the name of Y and her mother.
    6. Please don't disconnect by blocking any contact info including your wechat, your email, telephone at the moment.  Y and her mother did cut off communication links with me which is a very stupid thing to do.
    7. Please answer my questions above and send your answers together with marriage cert, if not, Divorce cert and explanation that you could not hand over EMS mail to Y as she moved out and you don't know her new address.
    8. I wish I can receive your feedback within 24hours.

    Thank you, jerry, my dear son in law.

     

     

     

    2025年7月25日星期五

    呼吁全球关注: 举报特大假冒波音飞机安全零件的老人,癌症晚期,家人不给医疗金,向法院起诉求偿,法院慢作为,胡作为,有可能耽误救治和生命

    我叫石xx,男,66岁,上海市松江区居民,2016年起举报特大假冒波音飞机安全零件案, 备受各种压力和司法腐败摧残,2021年被确诊癌症晚期。


    Deloitte  employee attacking  Father-in-law with extreme 

    offensive and political sensitive language and went free


    上海松江法院法官凌驾法律之上,抗拒最高法,拒不依法送达被告,故意耽搁,侵犯原告生命权





    上海市松江区人民法院陈昌书记,院长,

     

    我叫石xx,男,66岁,上海市松江区居民,2021年被确诊癌症晚期。

     

    我于2025年7月16日到贵院诉讼服务中心递交了石xx与石x赡养费纠纷以及石xx与任xx分割夫妻共同财产纠纷两个起诉材料。

    受理法官分别为4号窗口张法官和3号窗口沈法官。同时我向两位法官书面告知由于我身患绝症,得不到医疗金,请求法院加急立案,加急审理判决和执行,避免由于法院错误程序和其它因素延误,医疗金不到位而病情加速恶化导致轻生的悲剧发生,影响社会和谐安定。

    人民法院收到起诉状后,应依法在七日内立案。今天已是第9天,仍未立案。张,沈二位人民法官作为贵院窗口,宗旨意识淡薄,明知我身患绝症,刻不容缓,轻重缓急显见, 但却见事迟、行动慢、风险意识不足,甚至故意拖延,对人民的疾苦和生命危机冷漠,没有共情心,彰显贵院党建缺乏的短板。

    另外反映一个问题:(2024)沪0117民初25967号案主审法官蔡x法官明知时间对一个患绝症老人的重要,一个事实简单清楚的民诉案件,在我多次请求加急审理后,反而改简易程序为普通程序,为故意拖延,不作为找借口。2025年4月6日我书面质问既然改了普通程序,法官做了哪一件普通程序应该做的事?在4月21日电话告知时她给不出任何合理理由,让一个绝症老人当场崩溃暴怒。作为人民法官,人性何在,党性何在?非要逼人做非理性的事儿吗?


    ***  我, 石xx, 2025年7月16日向上海市松江区人民法院起诉索要女儿石x赡养费,法院于2025年7月25日立案。 因为我是确诊已4年多的癌症晚期老人,近期治疗出现耐药症状。我7月30日向主审法官惠x请求加急审理。时至2025年8月1日, 尚不见法院有任何动静。


    *** 起诉婚内夫妻财产分割, 法官不能及时履职, 延误送达



    陈书记,现在您已知晓我的诉求和问题举报,责无旁贷,请您带头重温习主席关于珠海体育场案件的批示,认真履职,查短板,亲自督办我的两个特急诉讼的整个过程,如您调离,请特别嘱咐您的下任继续督办,让一个绝症老人临死前及时得到公平正义和司法救济,避免悲剧的发生。

     

    此请求依法同步媒体监督。


    请求人: 石xx

    联系方式:

    email: charlesshi88@outlook.com

    抖音: 1126540041

    X : @CharlesShithew1

    Telegram: @charlesshi


    2025年7月25日


    2024年10月3日星期四

    请求上海市公安局长张亚宏责令督办松江分局违法办案

    请求上海市公安局长张亚宏督办

     张亚宏局长,您好,

    我叫石朝生,上海市民,65岁,退伍军人,癌症晚期病人。就以下举报久拖不决,党风政风问题严重,请您督办:

     事由:

     1.     我于2024年7月25日通过贵局官网(流水号20240725970950)和110信箱向贵局举报松江分局新桥派出所充当保护伞,违法办案,非法使用警械,非法拘禁,违法插手民事纠纷,敲诈勒索等。

    2.     贵局2024年7月29日将举报转送松江分局处理(系统编号2024210023661490)

    3.     2024年8月1日,我收到新桥派出所一位姓陶的警官电话,告知我举报违法办案的自查结果。其告知涉嫌违反《信访条例》第三十条和《公安机关信访工作规定》第十条的规定。

    4.     2024-08-05 通过110信箱请求贵局和松江分局依法请求就派出所违法违规处理举报做出说明,并请求依法严惩新桥派出所违法办案,违法处理举报。

    5.     2024年8月10日收到松江分局《专门程序处理告知书》沪公(松)信告字<2024> 193号,告知:反映的邻居恶意栽种毛竹问题,已转送新桥派出所按照法律程序处理。时至今日,新桥派出所对上级命令置若罔闻,继续充当违法侵权人保护伞。

    6.     2024年8月10日,由于没有收到松江分局信访部门的联系核实情况。我有理由怀疑,松江分局有可能不能依法按时处理举报,通过110信箱请求贵局纪检委介入督办。8月13日110信箱回复已将请求转送公安信访部门。

    7.     今日已是2024年10月3日,我的举报没有得到依法处理,也没有接到过任何松江公安或市局纪检信访部门联系,更没有收到任何依法处理结果或答复。

     诉求:

     1.     贵局信访部门和纪检系统不按党中央,习主席从严治警的要求办事,对属下派出所和警员违法办案的群众举报冷硬横推、不担当、不作为、不究治,在告知此案已引起社区和国际媒体关注发酵的情况下,依然无动于衷,十分有损公安执法形象; 松江分局信访部门违反《公安信访条例》第38条规定的“自收到信访事项之日起两个月内履行或者答复”,不把群众的合法举报当回事,拒不处理,拒不答复,也不把群众监督和媒体监督当回事,反映了信访部门党风政风问题严重,请张局长责令立即启动问责。

    2.     新桥派出所继续充当保护伞,或畏惧政府内保护伞的压力,无视上级机关命令,拒不依法处理恶意栽种毛竹的违法侵权人,反映处此案保护伞问题很严重,松江分局根本无力处理。请张局长亲自督办,责令提级查处,我不认为违法侵权人的保护伞已经到了贵局管不了的地步了,如果真的如此,请张局长向上级纪检部门甚至党中央,习主席请求责令,维护党中央要求的让每一件案件都能伸张公平正义,消除和预防有可能发生的严重社会事件隐患。

    3.     我依法保留请求媒体监督,群众监督,向上级乃至党中央,习主席反映情况权利,以上请求将同步上传国内外媒体。

     

    请求和举报人:石朝生

     

    2024年10月3日